European Machinery Directive helps with safe machinery speeds

Control Engineering International: European Union Machinery Directive includes standards that can help with permissible safe limits of operation, according to Control Engineering Europe.

Martin Kidman

While speed monitoring is often essential for safe control of a machine and protecting the operator, it is often overlooked when considering machine safety. To find permissible safe limits of operation, standards within the European Union Machinery Directive can help.

The Machinery Directive is long and complex. However, the specifications to cover each aspect of the design and manufacture of machines are helped by agreeing standards. Harmonized standards across the European Union (EU) give purchasers the confidence that a machine meets the requisite safety levels and presumes conformance to the Directive.

A list of Standards for the Machinery Directive can be found in the Official Journal of the EU, and each standard is one of three types.

A-Type Standard–Relates to basic safety containing basic terminology, principles of design and general aspects that can be applied to all machinery.

B-Type Standard–Addresses a safety aspect or protective device that can be used in a wide range of machinery for example:

C-Type Standard–Contains all safety requirements for a specific machine or type of machine. If this standard exists, it has priority over the A-type or B-type standard, for example:

The relevant directives and standards usually are added to the machine builder's declaration of conformity, which has to accompany any machinery as per the Machinery Directive. 

Speed monitoring

Speed monitoring is covered by B and/or C Type standards, depending on the machine. There are various machine speed parameters that could influence the risk of harm on a machine against identified limits. If the machine exceeds those limits then suitable measures are initiated. Thus, the monitoring of the speed becomes a safety function. Of course, there are many different types of machines; if a C-Standard exists for a particular machine, then you may find the speeds that have been agreed, though not always. Below are some examples from C-Standards and what the B-Standard says about speed:

C-Standard: BS EN 693 covers the safety of hydraulic presses. It states that the closing speed shall not exceed 10 mm/s when using a hold-to-run control device. ISO 10218 covers the safety requirements for industrial robots (Part 2: Robot systems and integration). The standard states that the maximum speed of the Tool Centre Point (TCP) shall not exceed 250 mm/s in manual mode and shall be possible only with the added use of an enabling device.

B-Standard: ISO 13849 is a B-Standard and covers the general principles for design of Safety-Related Parts of Control Systems (SRP/CS). This standard can be used, where no C-Standard exists. There are no speeds quoted but it does state that when safety-related parameters deviate from their limits then appropriate measures shall be initiated.

IEC 61800-5-2 is a B-type standard and defines the safety functions for drives. It specifies the requirements and makes recommendations for the design, development, integration, and validation of adjustable-speed electrical power drive systems suitable for use in safety-related applications. in terms of functional safety.

The Performance Level of the speed monitoring circuit may be defined in the C-Standard. If no C standard exists, then ISO 13849 or IEC 62061 can be used. If, for example, a safe speed is identified as a condition for locking or unlocking a gate, then this would form part of the safety function and should undergo the same functional safety design process as the interlocking function.

ISO 13849 and IEC 62061 both outline a method for determining the required safety performance level for a safety function. Each method can be used to determine the required performance level (PL), or the required Safety Integrity Level (SIL) respectively.

Safety performance level

Once the required safety performance level has been determined, the speed monitoring control system can be designed.

Speed monitoring can be implemented either externally, when the safety is implemented outside the drive and the speed controller requires feedback or, internally, where the safety feedback is inside the drive as an integral function.

Either way, it is common to use rotary encoders and, as a general rule, when used with appropriate and relevant associated speed monitoring equipment, one encoder can provide PLc/SIL1 and two encoders can achieve up to PLe/SIL3.

Machinery speed is an important safety parameter and always should be considered as part of the risk assessment. C-Type and B-Type standards can give guidance; however, risk assessment tools do not replace good engineering judgment but aid it. Careful consideration should be given to the determination of the required safety performance level of a speed monitoring circuit and it should be designed accordingly.

Dr. Martin Kidman is a safety specialist at Sick UK; edited by Mark T. Hoske, content manager, CFE Media, Control Engineering, mhoske(at), from a Feb. 6, Control Engineering Europe article, "Sticking to the speed limit."


Key concepts

Consider this

Are you using risk assessments to help determine safe machine operating speeds?

ONLINE extra

This March Control Engineering article contains more than would fit in print. Link to the original article below.

See other international coverage at  

Related News
 Integrate safety into a business strategy - 24.05.2016 13:00



Visit Our Sites

Contact Us


Close Home
click me